Skip to content

CBC Commentary

Too much of a good thing?

By Dan Woolley

March 08, 2010

What producer would not want sky-high prices for their commodity? But the current state of the blueberry industry shows sometimes prices can be too good.

In the last few years blueberry growers enjoyed great returns, but those high prices prompted a massive expansion in production that could keep their industry in a long-term price slump.
 
Here, in Nova Scotia, we’ve had a major expansion of low-bush, wild blueberry acreage.
But elsewhere, it is the high bush or cultivated blueberry with growers in traditional North American and European growing areas increasing production.

There has also been a host of new entrants in places which, until recently, have never seen a blueberry – in California, Argentina, Chile and China. Chile now exports 87 million pounds of high bush blueberries annually. Argentina ships another 25 million pounds to global markets, while China is rapidly ramping up production, taking advantage of its cheap labour.
 
Price plunge

Production of wild and cultivated blueberries has nearly doubled in the last 15 years. High prices – which hit $1.05 per pound for wild blueberries in 2007 – also affected consumption.
Processors started looking for cheaper alternatives by using more sour cherries, apples, strawberries and cranberries. Between 2005 and 2007, wild blueberry exports to Japan – the fruit’s best market – fell by one-third.

Wild blueberries still command a premium over high bush; but with prices at 35 cents per pound, growers are recovering only half their cost of production.

It’s a familiar story of boom and bust and what is amazing blueberry acreage is still growing, although at a much slower rate.

Growers are hoping for the return of good times. They will, eventually, but when they do, maybe people will belatedly realize they can end again.
 
For CBC commentary, I’m Dan Woolley, a freelance farm writer in Truro, Nova Scotia.
 


Responses to this article

From Old Abe on 10/03/2010 6:23:06 PM

What planet is this guy from? We had a price of 1.05 for two years only ,2006 and 2007. These prices were set arbitarily by the processors, the growers had absolutely no input into the prices.It is true that there was some increase in acreage due to the higher prices however as it takes at least ten years to get a wild blueberry field into any reasonable production the increased acreage had no bearing at all on the price collapse.It may be that the higher prices affected consumption but then one would think the processors would have figured that out before raising the price to the buyers and growers. The highbush blueberry is an inferior product as anyone that has tried both berries knows so the demand for lowbush blueberries is still there.The price collapse has little to do with over production and more to do with vertical intergretation and the concentration of power in the hands of a few processors.The manipulation of the price structure was designed to bring more area into production and then to enable the big companies to acquire that land cheaply when those who invested in expansion are forced to sell.


Comment Post a response to this Commentary

To respond to this CBC Commentary and have your response posted just below the article, please fill out your name and comment below.

We welcome your comments on this topic. Any comments containing unsuitable language or which make personal attacks on the author of the article or fellow respondents will be removed.