Skip to content

CBC Commentary

Who is crazy here?

By Kevin Hursh

March 15, 2010

When it comes to livestock identification, Canada and the U.S are headed in opposite directions and it makes you wonder whether one of us is crazy.

Here in Canada, we’ve got age verification, RFID ear tags, movement tracking and a premises identification program. We’ve done just about everything but attach a GPS locator to each individual cow.

Meanwhile Washington has pretty much caved in to ranchers and feedlot operators who complained about all the expenses and paperwork that comes with that kind of traceability. Despite years of work and countless millions invested, the Americans are going to back to Square 1. Only cattle moving between states will need to be tracked, the system will be run piecemeal by individual states and tribal nations, and it will be a “collaborative” process – which means there will be lots of talking before anything happens.

So while we’re piling on more animal ID expenses, our main trading partner is going the opposite direction. Understandably, many cattle producers – even those who initially supported traceability – question the wisdom of the road we're taking.

Traceability has yet to pay significant dividends. Overwhelmingly, we have commodity beef and yet we're implementing a Cadillac ID system.

Potential payoff

However, our system could have a huge payoff – one completely unrelated to disease traceability or age verification.

The Canadian Cattlemen's Association is building a value chain database that will track individual animal performance, health, carcass data and more – and allow all owners of that animal to look at the data.

For the first time, producers will be able to follow the performance of their calves through the feedlot and into packing plants. Finally, cow-calf producers – who don't usually retain their calves until slaughter weight – will be able to see how their calves grow or how the carcasses grade.

With information will come power – power to adjust genetics and production practices, and hopefully the power to command premium prices for premium livestock.

There may be problems and the program is voluntary, but it holds huge potential. If it achieves that potential, it may even make the pain and expense of animal ID worthwhile.

For CBC commentary, I’m Kevin Hursh, a consulting agrologist and farmer based in Saskatoon. 

For more on the Beef InfoXchange System, go to http://bixs.cattle.ca


Responses to this article

From royko on 16/03/2010 3:43:45 PM

Perhaps if there was a credit on a animal sale for the work done by a farmer to to buy and tag as this is being mandated by government bureaucrats with no idea of the work involved to the benefit of consumers not farmers.


From Bugsy on 16/03/2010 9:19:24 AM

My friend and I hauled finished steers to our local abattior.Mine had there R F I D tags and I had the birth certifics with them. The inspector was impressed. My friend taged his cattle as they loaded them.Two had cut the last molars so with not being regestered the inspector had the abattior cut out the back bone .So that cost him 35 cents / pound on a 700 pound carcus times that buy two you do the math. The inspector was not impressed. and neither was my neighbour.


From Maeva on 15/03/2010 12:40:17 PM

Our abattoir had the Government Inspector as him for his list of eartags and farm names as he had "lost" his documentation. Even the Inspectors don't take this system seriously.


From Maeva on 15/03/2010 12:38:05 PM

Talk about a waste of money, a Government Inspector recently asked our abattoir for the abattoir's list of his last 6 months of eartags and farm names as he had lost his records! Even the Inspectors don't take this system seriously.


From Little Coyote on 15/03/2010 10:47:20 AM

I and my husband as a Ranchers we believe it is a waste of time & waste of money. It was way better back then, then now.


From FarmerMike on 15/03/2010 8:57:24 AM

I still believe in the the system,but am galled to no end with things like American slaughterhouses not having to deal with specific risk material while we have to.Kevin,I hope you're right on potential payoff.


From topgriz on 15/03/2010 12:56:04 AM

i feel the system implemented is way too costly. disease will come and go regardless of where the animals come from. the americans know it and therefor are doing the sencible thing. cut down the cost .


Comment Post a response to this Commentary

To respond to this CBC Commentary and have your response posted just below the article, please fill out your name and comment below.

We welcome your comments on this topic. Any comments containing unsuitable language or which make personal attacks on the author of the article or fellow respondents will be removed.